<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cell Phones &amp; Health</title>
	<atom:link href="http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://safecellusa.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:32:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Cell Phone Towers: NIMBY by estiallina</title>
		<link>http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/2009/03/01/cell-phone-towers-nimby/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>estiallina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Absolutely true and good point. Again, i think we can enjoy the technology and be prudent with it.
Cell phone radiation exposure should be minimized by using them for emergencies and short
&#039;need-to&#039; calls only. They are not meant for long-winded conversations and business negotiations.

Unless, of course, your phone is protected.

I thank Steve Kazella for his contribution to this blog and welcome all thoughtful comments and 
debate on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely true and good point. Again, i think we can enjoy the technology and be prudent with it.<br />
Cell phone radiation exposure should be minimized by using them for emergencies and short<br />
&#8216;need-to&#8217; calls only. They are not meant for long-winded conversations and business negotiations.</p>
<p>Unless, of course, your phone is protected.</p>
<p>I thank Steve Kazella for his contribution to this blog and welcome all thoughtful comments and<br />
debate on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cell Phone Towers: NIMBY by Steve Kazella</title>
		<link>http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/2009/03/01/cell-phone-towers-nimby/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Kazella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Estiallina thanks for the detailed reply...   Sometimes the biggest fear, especially with wireless that people have is the fear of the unknown.  

Bottom line -- in my opinion, cell towers and cell phones save lives. For example, in the last week we have had two extremely rare tornado warnings in our county. Both times we were notified well in advance because of my cell phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Estiallina thanks for the detailed reply&#8230;   Sometimes the biggest fear, especially with wireless that people have is the fear of the unknown.  </p>
<p>Bottom line &#8212; in my opinion, cell towers and cell phones save lives. For example, in the last week we have had two extremely rare tornado warnings in our county. Both times we were notified well in advance because of my cell phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cell Phone Towers: NIMBY by estiallina</title>
		<link>http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/2009/03/01/cell-phone-towers-nimby/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>estiallina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-63</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true that we need cell phone antennae if we want good reception. And we do. We all do.
It&#039;s also true what Steve says about baby monitors and other sources of EMF. 
I&#039;d like to make a few distinctions here: EMF and cell phone radiation aren&#039;t the same thing.
Baby monitors obviously use some form of wireless communication in addition to the EMF.
A baby monitor is near the baby for all the time the baby is in his crib - which is a considerable
amount of time during very critical stages of development. I&#039;m not well-versed on the technology
of baby monitors and will invite Steve Kazella to enlighten us with a guest post. But exposure
to baby monitors and bedside digital clocks are a real health concern. Not to diminish that 
issue at all, but most of us do not spend the bulk of our hours near a baby monitor, but many
people do spend hours a day on a cell phone. There are those who don&#039;t even have a landline
and use a cell phone exclusively. These are all issues, and I don&#039;t want to sweep anything under
the rug.

We are trading health and quality of life for technology and convenience. It&#039;s a choice we&#039;re
making as individuals and as a society. What can we as individuals and a society to mitigate
these risks? First thing, is to acknowledge them, rather than dismiss them by pointing at
something that may be perceived as worse. We need to become aware and address as
many of these concerns as we can - not one at the expense of the other.

Our homes are full of EMF. EMF exposure is considered a health hazard by well-known environmental  
scientists.

Cell phone radiation is MICROWAVE radiation. This radiation is being emitted directed at our heads (eyes, ears,
and brain). Recent studies in Israel attribute cell phone use to the 5-fold increase in salivary gland tumors.
A study done in Netanya, Israel indicates a 10-fold increase in breast cancer among those living within 300
meters of cell phone towers, and 4-fold increase in cancer overall, compared to the rest of the population.

This is why not in my backyard. But they&#039;re there and they&#039;re not going anywhere. If anything these towers will
proliferate with new technology and in order to reduce our direct exposure by cell phone. If the phones have
better connectivity, they need less power to connect your call.

The bigger question is this: where are our legislators who are supposed to safeguard the public health?
Why is there no legislation for accompanying technology to make our EMF and cell phone radiation rich
environment safe? 

It&#039;s a given that we live in a wireless world, so why not develop the technologies to protect us from
the very hazards we&#039;re creating?

For the EMF in your home, I recommend getting salt lamps - and LIGHTING them! It&#039;s the heat from the
bulb that causes the mineral to emit positive ions, which help to balance all the negative ions produced
by the wiring, appliances and other electrical devices in your home.

The SafeCell cell phone radiation product keeps you safe from the negative effects of cell phone radiation.
My happy customers tell me that they no longer get headaches, hot ear and even feel more alert througout
the day. It is the only proven product on the market, and can last a lifetime. 
What about all the environmental radiation from wireless modems, other people&#039;s cell phones (passive
radiation)? I recommend the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.q-linkproducts.com/Scripts/default.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Q-Link from Clarus&lt;/a&gt; for body-worn protection from EMF&#039;s.  

To more info and purchase, contact me at esti@safecell.co.il for details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true that we need cell phone antennae if we want good reception. And we do. We all do.<br />
It&#8217;s also true what Steve says about baby monitors and other sources of EMF.<br />
I&#8217;d like to make a few distinctions here: EMF and cell phone radiation aren&#8217;t the same thing.<br />
Baby monitors obviously use some form of wireless communication in addition to the EMF.<br />
A baby monitor is near the baby for all the time the baby is in his crib &#8211; which is a considerable<br />
amount of time during very critical stages of development. I&#8217;m not well-versed on the technology<br />
of baby monitors and will invite Steve Kazella to enlighten us with a guest post. But exposure<br />
to baby monitors and bedside digital clocks are a real health concern. Not to diminish that<br />
issue at all, but most of us do not spend the bulk of our hours near a baby monitor, but many<br />
people do spend hours a day on a cell phone. There are those who don&#8217;t even have a landline<br />
and use a cell phone exclusively. These are all issues, and I don&#8217;t want to sweep anything under<br />
the rug.</p>
<p>We are trading health and quality of life for technology and convenience. It&#8217;s a choice we&#8217;re<br />
making as individuals and as a society. What can we as individuals and a society to mitigate<br />
these risks? First thing, is to acknowledge them, rather than dismiss them by pointing at<br />
something that may be perceived as worse. We need to become aware and address as<br />
many of these concerns as we can &#8211; not one at the expense of the other.</p>
<p>Our homes are full of EMF. EMF exposure is considered a health hazard by well-known environmental<br />
scientists.</p>
<p>Cell phone radiation is MICROWAVE radiation. This radiation is being emitted directed at our heads (eyes, ears,<br />
and brain). Recent studies in Israel attribute cell phone use to the 5-fold increase in salivary gland tumors.<br />
A study done in Netanya, Israel indicates a 10-fold increase in breast cancer among those living within 300<br />
meters of cell phone towers, and 4-fold increase in cancer overall, compared to the rest of the population.</p>
<p>This is why not in my backyard. But they&#8217;re there and they&#8217;re not going anywhere. If anything these towers will<br />
proliferate with new technology and in order to reduce our direct exposure by cell phone. If the phones have<br />
better connectivity, they need less power to connect your call.</p>
<p>The bigger question is this: where are our legislators who are supposed to safeguard the public health?<br />
Why is there no legislation for accompanying technology to make our EMF and cell phone radiation rich<br />
environment safe? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a given that we live in a wireless world, so why not develop the technologies to protect us from<br />
the very hazards we&#8217;re creating?</p>
<p>For the EMF in your home, I recommend getting salt lamps &#8211; and LIGHTING them! It&#8217;s the heat from the<br />
bulb that causes the mineral to emit positive ions, which help to balance all the negative ions produced<br />
by the wiring, appliances and other electrical devices in your home.</p>
<p>The SafeCell cell phone radiation product keeps you safe from the negative effects of cell phone radiation.<br />
My happy customers tell me that they no longer get headaches, hot ear and even feel more alert througout<br />
the day. It is the only proven product on the market, and can last a lifetime.<br />
What about all the environmental radiation from wireless modems, other people&#8217;s cell phones (passive<br />
radiation)? I recommend the <a href="http://www.q-linkproducts.com/Scripts/default.asp" rel="nofollow">Q-Link from Clarus</a> for body-worn protection from EMF&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>To more info and purchase, contact me at <a href="mailto:esti@safecell.co.il">esti@safecell.co.il</a> for details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cell Phone Towers: NIMBY by Steve Kazella</title>
		<link>http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/2009/03/01/cell-phone-towers-nimby/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Kazella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Can you imagine that? Good thing we don&#039;t have any activist judges here in the United States. Babies are exposed to more EMF from a wireless transmitter that worried parents keep near their beds than a five carrier cell tower powered up on full blast can produce. The transmitter is usually just a few feet away -- while the big evil cell tower has exponentially more separation. 

Cell Towers NIMBY = Needed in my back yard  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you imagine that? Good thing we don&#8217;t have any activist judges here in the United States. Babies are exposed to more EMF from a wireless transmitter that worried parents keep near their beds than a five carrier cell tower powered up on full blast can produce. The transmitter is usually just a few feet away &#8212; while the big evil cell tower has exponentially more separation. </p>
<p>Cell Towers NIMBY = Needed in my back yard  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cell Phone Radiation Standards: Acceptable Risk? by Cell Phone Radiation Standards: Acceptable Risk? : thegameoflove</title>
		<link>http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/2008/08/22/cell-phone-radiation-standards-acceptable-risk/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Cell Phone Radiation Standards: Acceptable Risk? : thegameoflove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by estiallina [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by estiallina [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Word is Out: Cell Phones are Bad for Kids by Alex</title>
		<link>http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/the-word-is-out-cell-phones-are-bad-for-kids/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 23:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Your blog is interesting! 
 
Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blog is interesting! </p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by ted c</title>
		<link>http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/about/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>ted c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Hi there!

Came across your site and thought that you might be interested in an article from our magazine, The Walrus. Our latest issue includes an article on radiation and cancer -- namely cellular phones. The author, Melinda Wenner, discusses this topic and explores why researchers have yet to come out with conclusive evidence with regards to this potential health hazard.

http://www.walrusmagazine.com/articles/2008.09-health-cellphone-brain-tumour-melinda-wenner/


Comments and feedback are always welcome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there!</p>
<p>Came across your site and thought that you might be interested in an article from our magazine, The Walrus. Our latest issue includes an article on radiation and cancer &#8212; namely cellular phones. The author, Melinda Wenner, discusses this topic and explores why researchers have yet to come out with conclusive evidence with regards to this potential health hazard.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.walrusmagazine.com/articles/2008.09-health-cellphone-brain-tumour-melinda-wenner/" rel="nofollow">http://www.walrusmagazine.com/articles/2008.09-health-cellphone-brain-tumour-melinda-wenner/</a></p>
<p>Comments and feedback are always welcome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Word is Out: Cell Phones are Bad for Kids by ATT Cell Phones</title>
		<link>http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/the-word-is-out-cell-phones-are-bad-for-kids/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>ATT Cell Phones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think we will know for sure whether cell phones are bad for a long time. That being said, I think it is good advice to use them as infrequently as possible just in case they really do contribute to cancer (or something else).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we will know for sure whether cell phones are bad for a long time. That being said, I think it is good advice to use them as infrequently as possible just in case they really do contribute to cancer (or something else).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Your Bio-Field? by Colon Therapist + Blogger</title>
		<link>http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/what-is-your-bio-field/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Colon Therapist + Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://safecellusa.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/what-is-your-bio-field/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>This is quite shocking to me. I didn&#039;t know it will influence our health so much when it talks about energy. I always place my handphone far enough to listen to the ringtone. I will carry it around only if I were to go out. So, time spend with my phone(near to me) everyday is around an hour.

Is this safe enough? 

I do believe about energy. In fact, I read a lot about energy and love to talk about it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite shocking to me. I didn&#8217;t know it will influence our health so much when it talks about energy. I always place my handphone far enough to listen to the ringtone. I will carry it around only if I were to go out. So, time spend with my phone(near to me) everyday is around an hour.</p>
<p>Is this safe enough? </p>
<p>I do believe about energy. In fact, I read a lot about energy and love to talk about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
